Comments on: College Football Conference Expansion News http://www.fbschedules.com/2010/06/college-football-conference-expansion-news/ College Football Schedules, Pro Football Schedules and Tickets Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:28:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jinzo http://www.fbschedules.com/2010/06/college-football-conference-expansion-news/#comment-1579 Jinzo Fri, 11 Jun 2010 05:18:32 +0000 http://www.fbschedules.com/?p=3072#comment-1579 Nebraska to the Big 10 is a great move,adds yet another run first,pass second type of offense and the Huskers could really quite nicely. Pac 10 blew it,they should had added Boise State and Fresno State,both very dynamic with room to grow and thrive. Colorado is a poor call... Nebraska to the Big 10 is a great move,adds yet another run first,pass second type of offense and the Huskers could really quite nicely.

Pac 10 blew it,they should had added Boise State and Fresno State,both very dynamic with room to grow and thrive.

Colorado is a poor call…

]]> By: PJWB http://www.fbschedules.com/2010/06/college-football-conference-expansion-news/#comment-1576 PJWB Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:57:47 +0000 http://www.fbschedules.com/?p=3072#comment-1576 Not surprisingly, I'm a Kentucky fan and thus am committed to the SEC. Of course, there is no talk of an SEC split. There is talk, however, of the SEC growing in number. I'm generally opposed to this because 12 is a magic number. In the SEC, each team has five divisional opponents and three non-divisional opponents. This pits non-divisional teams against one another every other year with a home game against each non-divisional team once every four years. Ideal. Any more teams, and it could be years between non-divisional opponents. So to answer your question, I'm opposed to the idea of a super-conference. The Big East is there (for now) and the Pac-10, er 16?, may be on its way - but I don't particularly care for it. Not surprisingly, I’m a Kentucky fan and thus am committed to the SEC. Of course, there is no talk of an SEC split. There is talk, however, of the SEC growing in number.

I’m generally opposed to this because 12 is a magic number. In the SEC, each team has five divisional opponents and three non-divisional opponents. This pits non-divisional teams against one another every other year with a home game against each non-divisional team once every four years. Ideal. Any more teams, and it could be years between non-divisional opponents.

So to answer your question, I’m opposed to the idea of a super-conference. The Big East is there (for now) and the Pac-10, er 16?, may be on its way – but I don’t particularly care for it.

]]>