ACC to play Nine Game Conference Football Schedule

By Kevin Kelley -

ACCThe ACC announced today that they will play a nine game conference football schedule when Pittsburgh and Syracuse join the league. The two schools are currently slated to join the ACC in 2014.

ACC Commissioner John Swofford also announced today that Syracuse will join the Atlantic Division and Pittsburgh will join the Coastal Division. Current ACC division crossover games will remain intact, while Pittsburgh and Syracuse will become crossover partners.

When Pitt and Syracuse join the ACC, the league will play a nine-game conference schedule. The format will consist of each team playing all six in its division each year, plus its primary crossover partner each year and two rotating opponents from the opposite division. This six-year cycle allows each team to play each divisional opponent and its primary crossover partner six times (three home and three away) while also playing each rotating crossover opponent two times (one home and one away).

“We have been engaged in discussions on the various options for integrating Pitt and Syracuse since early fall,” said ACC Commissioner John Swofford. “It’s a tremendous tribute to the leadership at our schools that we will be able to seamlessly add Pitt and Syracuse at the appropriate time when they become full playing members.”

With the addition of Pittsburgh and Syracuse, here is how the ACC Atlantic and Coastal Divisions will look:

ACC Atlantic

ACC Coastal

  1. Mr. Apples
    February 3, 2012 at 4:35 pm

    Those divisions are really strange. They need to go to a North/South setup…

    ACC North: Boston College, Syracuse, Pittsburgh, Maryland, Virginia, Virginia Tech, Wake Forest
    ACC South: Duke, North Carolina, NC State, Clemson, Georgia Tech, Florida State, Miami

    February 3, 2012 at 6:46 pm

    My money says cuse and pitt will be in acc in 2013 after everything is settled !

  3. nick
    February 4, 2012 at 11:28 am

    But if they did the North South setup, The South would be way to stacked with GT, Clemson, FSU, and Miami.

    • dawg fan
      February 6, 2012 at 11:53 am

      it would just be like the sec west or the old big 12 south.

    • Dukefan101
      February 26, 2012 at 3:56 pm

      cept then the north would be UNC, Virginia, VT, Pittsburg. UNC = GT, VT=FSU, Pittsburg = Clemson, Virginia< Miami (but a little)… I think it would be pretty fair

  4. Billy
    February 13, 2012 at 11:12 pm

    I think they need to do a true longitude finding… then divide them up…

    A true “Coastal” and “Atlantic region” feel…

    Think of a tidal wave rolling in from the east… what would be the first 7 schools hit???

  5. Billy
    February 13, 2012 at 11:31 pm

    Scratch that idea… I used the coordinates of each school and this is how it would look…

    Atlantic = GT, FSU, Clemson, Wake, The U, Va Tech and Pitt

    Coastal = BC, Terps, Pack, Cuse, Duke, Heels and Cavs

  6. Susan
    February 15, 2012 at 10:55 am

    Is anyone else frustrated with the ACC’s practice of putting fans last in scheduling decisions? You cannot plan to attend a football game, stay overnight, or see friends with such short notice of actual game times. TV revenues come first, fans last these days. It is past Valentine’s day and we are still waiting for the fall schedules so we can schedule other events.

    • bluehokie2006
      July 18, 2012 at 9:36 pm

      The lack of actual game times until the last minute is not an ACC problem…it’s an ESPN problem, and happens no matter what conference you’re in.

    February 15, 2012 at 11:32 pm

    Agree with Susan….can’t believe it takes so long to put the schedule together. Would be nice to be able to book hotels for away games at places like Clemson that fill up so fast.

      February 17, 2012 at 3:05 pm

      AGREE 100% The ACC leadership SUCKS!! We need a North/South division. Each division would have more common rivals. With VT,Pitt,BC and (Virginia and Maryland) will be VERY competitive in a year or two. Maimi has done nothing!! so in the South you have Clemson, FSU, GT, UNC,NCST..SOUND EQUAL TO ME….Plus ALOT BETTER FOOTBALL !!!!

    February 21, 2012 at 6:11 pm

    FSU and the “EWE” will never be in the same division. The ACC wants to keep that available for a potential ACC Championship game. That’s assuming that the “EWE” ever makes it back to the big time.

  9. Ryan
    March 30, 2012 at 11:23 pm

    will these be the same conferences in basketball?

    • Chip
      May 29, 2012 at 7:25 pm

      Ryan, I’m pretty sure they’re not going to separate divisions for basketball – this would just be for football.

  10. pa
    April 14, 2012 at 2:06 am

    these divisions are so confaluted, the acc changed how many years ago and I still can’t tell you how it aligns. I know in the pac12 all the schools want games in southern california so Im sure all the schools want access to games in florida. still I think I like apples schedule other than put unc in the north and wf in the south, unc is generally a stronger team so that would balance a little more.

  11. pa
    April 14, 2012 at 2:16 am

    how about putting the old big east in one division: bc,pitt,syr,vt,mia
    for balance these teams seperate divisions with cross rival
    ‘south acc northeast acc
    clemson gt
    fsu mia
    nc st unc
    duke syr
    uva vt
    md bc
    wf pitt

    not perfect but at least the northeast gets a guaranteed florida,georgia and carolina game every other year

    • David
      April 30, 2012 at 12:46 am

      They’re trying to keep the original contacts in tact. When they expanded the north carolina block was to be split in two because those were the weakest teams at the time and miami and fl state were to be different divisions because of the championship game predictions. If 16 teams ever come there would be a huge realignment. After that everything was decided by tv and recruiting markets.

  12. Chip
    May 29, 2012 at 7:34 pm

    I’m not convinced that moving to nine-game conference schedules is a good idea. It provides far less flexibility for teams to either strengthen or weaken their overall schedule (depending on how good or bad they are) and on the expansion front, it provides a strong disincentive for Notre Dame to consider joining the ACC.

    Given that, I’d also have different divisions. I’d like North-South but it would just be too unbalanced. I’d probably do one of these two setups (rivals listed together):

    BC — Syracuse
    Pitt — MD
    VT — UVA
    NCSU — UNC
    Wake — Duke
    GT — Clemson
    Miami — FSU


    BC — Syracuse
    Pitt — MD
    UVA — VT
    UNC — NCSU
    Duke — Wake
    Clemson — GT
    Miami — FSU

  13. bluehokie2006
    July 18, 2012 at 9:35 pm

    The major downside to a North/South division is that it would recreate the old Big East in the north, but add Maryland and UVA, which I’m sure would piss both of them off. Meanwhile, I’m sure VT and BC don’t want to go back to playing the same teams they did in the Big East days, because that was part of the reason for moving.

  14. Nate
    September 18, 2013 at 4:53 pm

    One factor that seems to be forgotten. Maryland is leaving the ACC and joining the Big Ten. So any realignment has to be put on hold. How does Notre Dame fit in?

2 Pings to ACC to play Nine Game Conference Football Schedule

  1. Pingback: 2013-14 Georgia-Clemson Football Series in Jeopardy?

  2. Pingback: AD comments cast cloud over Georgia-Clemson 2013-14 Football Series