2013 NFL Schedule: Dec. 22 Bears-Eagles Moved to 8:30pm; Patriots-Ravens to 4:25pm

By Kevin Kelley -
LeSean McCoy

LeSean McCoy and the Eagles are 8-5. (Howard Smith-USA TODAY Sports)

Two NFL games on the schedule for the Week 16 (Dec. 22, 2013) have been moved in accordance with the league’s flexible scheduling rules.

Chicago at Philadelphia, which was originally scheduled for 1pm ET on FOX, has been moved to the Sunday Night Football slot at 8:30pm ET on NBC.

The Bears and Eagles are both in playoff contention. Chicago is currently in the hunt for a spot, while Philadelphia is a projected 3rd seed if the playoffs started today.

New England at Baltimore was originally scheduled for Sunday Night Football on Dec. 22, but it has been moved to 4:25pm on CBS.

The Patriots haven’t officially clinched a playoff spot, but they are 10-3 overall and currently lead the AFC East by three games. Baltimore is 7-6 and is currently projected as the 6th seed.

Back in 2006, the NFL implemented flexible scheduling for Sunday games in Weeks 10-15 and Week 17 to ensure quality match-ups. Sunday afternoon games are eligible to be moved to Sunday Night Football, with the night game being moved to the afternoon.

Football Schedules

Follow FBSchedules.com on Facebook, Twitter, and Google+Subscribe via Email
Categories: NFL

14 Comments to 2013 NFL Schedule: Dec. 22 Bears-Eagles Moved to 8:30pm; Patriots-Ravens to 4:25pm

  1. JT said....

    I will write a strongly worded letter to the NFL to oppose this!

    December 10, 2013 at 2:06 pm
  2. dave_K said....

    Now Jim Nantz can call yet another Patriots game on CBS…….he strives for 10/year.

    December 10, 2013 at 3:18 pm
  3. carol Scott said....

    And the raven’s and patriots aren’t in contention?? One of whom is the defending would champions? Give me a break? I hope your numbers tank. Obviously, the NFL it’s clueless; they seriously think Philly and Chicago it’s a better game and will get better ratings…..wake up!

    December 10, 2013 at 8:15 pm
  4. dawgsrule said....

    Prior to, CBS was stuck with Pit/GB (likely w no Rodgers) and Oak/SD in the 4:25 slot, and I don’t think they can have just three games in a 1:00 window in a non-bye week (thus no Ind/KC flexing). So it’s a help-out to CBS from the NFL. Besides, we’re complaining about the Patriots NOT being on Sunday night? Spare me……………………….

    Also FOX already has the Saints/Panthers rematch as their #1 1:00 game. You could say flex that but not only was that just on but FOX already went without either Hawk/Niner game in 2012, they’re not going to not protect this one.

    If any game should have got it should have been Cards/Hawks. Not only a singleheader 4:05 game, but how does NBC not have the team with the NFC’s best record (3-1 vs the 2-3-4 teams) on more than once? But it is what it is.

    So here’s an idea, drop the phony outrage.

    December 10, 2013 at 9:22 pm
  5. michael miller said....

    New England versus Baltimore is always a great game the Chicago Philly game I give us channel changing excuses

    December 10, 2013 at 9:24 pm
  6. Mike Streadwick said....

    Chicago is hot right now with McCown playing better than Cutler. So change channels if you don’t like it.

    December 10, 2013 at 11:43 pm
  7. Justin Colon said....

    $&@! u guys Philly all the way! This is guna be way better game than the 7-6 defending champs who aren’t even guna make the playoffs!

    December 11, 2013 at 12:47 am
  8. Cindy said....

    Since when is 8:30 PM EST on a Sunday “prime-time”? Most folks have to go to work the next day. I never stay up until Midnight to watch any game. I’m in bed by half-time. Bummer.

    December 11, 2013 at 9:08 am
  9. Toonses said....

    Go Eagels!!! F$@? Tom Brady and his early bedtime bullsh$@ fans!

    December 12, 2013 at 10:01 am
  10. Icarus said....

    I think it’s a chance to grab an extra market (Chicago/Midwest) in prime time. I recall reading a long time ago when Chicago was horrendous and “banned” from MNF — they missed the ratings the Chicago audience brought.

    December 12, 2013 at 10:35 am
  11. bob said....

    as an eagles fan I think its bullshit that I can’t enjoy a game and have a couple beers. If its 1:00 then its 1:00 don’t fuck us fans

    December 12, 2013 at 4:26 pm
  12. gary said....

    Report: Obscure broadcast contract term drove Week 16 flex decision

    Posted by Mike Florio on December 11, 2013, 1:48 PM EST
    AFC Championship – Baltimore Ravens v New England Patriots
    Getty Images
    Tuesday’s decision to replace the Week 16 Sunday night game between the Patriots and Ravens with a showdown between the Bears and Eagles surprised many.

    And for good reason. The Ravens are chasing the No. 6 seed, the Patriots are chasing the No. 1 seed while trying to hold off the Bengals for the No. 2 seed, and the two teams have met in the last two AFC title games. (That said, Bears-Eagles has significant playoff implications, too.)

    So why did the NFL swap the games? According to John Ourand of SportsBusiness Journal, the league made the decision in part to have maximum flexibility for the regular-season finale in Week 17.

    The current broadcast contracts (which expire this year) require that the gap between games pilfered from CBS and FOX for Sunday night be no more than three. If Pats-Ravens hadn’t been flexed, the gap would have been at three, with CBS losing 25 and FOX losing 22. Without taking a game from FOX for Week 16, only FOX could have lost a game for Week 17. Now, both networks are in play for Week 17.

    The goal for the league (and it’s always an NFL decision, not an NBC decision) when selecting the prime-time game in Week 17 is to identify a game that has playoff implications unaffected by any of the outcomes in the other 15 games. That becomes easiest when two teams are squaring off for a division title, with the winner securing a playoff spot and the loser earning a trip home.

    December 14, 2013 at 9:19 am
  13. Angelo Sapia said....

    What moron thinks Philly and Chicago is a better game than Ravens vs. Patriots?? Idiots!

    December 18, 2013 at 12:14 pm

Leave a Reply